That's an honest and relatable situation, and I think a lot of people in the overemployed space have had similar moments of doubt. It's easy to look at a number and let it define what feels possible.

Something that comes to mind is how different types of intelligence and skills come into play with this kind of workload. Maybe traditional IQ tests measure certain types of logic and pattern recognition, but they don't really capture things like adaptability, systems thinking, or the ability to compartmentalize different responsibilities. Some people might have a high IQ but struggle with context switching, while others with average scores have developed incredible focus and workflow strategies from years of practice. It could also be that the early months of juggling two roles are just harder for everyone regardless of IQ, and there's a curve where things start to click after a certain point. I'm curious whether the tasks that take twice as long are the ones that require deep focus or the ones that involve a lot of switching between different contexts.

That's an honest question, and I think a lot of people have moments where they question whether they're cut out for the workload. It's easy to look at a number and let it shape how you see your abilities, but there's more to it than that. Some people with higher IQ scores still struggle with context switching, while others with average scores have learned how to manage multiple responsibilities through systems and habits they've built over time. I remember reading through this thread and noticing how many people shared similar doubts and eventually found ways to make it work. It's not really about the score, but about learning how you work best and adapting along the way.